"Who was this goddess, the female counterpart of male deities, who did not allow mortal women to worship her freely without the mediation of men? It was only as I became a serious student of social sciences that I began to see the linkages between social perceptions of gender and the gods and goddesses that were part of the Brahminical religious traditions. Caste and community were major factors in her worship," she says in her religious non-fiction volume, "The Book of Lakshmi", published by Penguin-Books India this week.
The slim non-fiction book retells the myths surrounding the goddess through a series of illustrations and short stories and poses questions "on the gender bias in the worship rituals of the most feminine of all deities".
"My interest in studying and understanding the goddesses can be traced back to the time, when as a young child I noticed numerous festivals that centred on the family's 'kula devi'. Kanchi Kamakshi, a variation of Lakshmi, generated much excitement among all members of the household," the writer said, explaining what made her explore the deity.
"Why was my mother not allowed to be a part of the festivities on certain occasions and not allowed in the sacred areas? Why was it that all the 'paattis' (grandmothers) with shaven heads and crisp ochre-coloured 'saris' were not allowed to enter the kitchen on these days? I was also affronted to see my favourite household help severely admonished for entering the house on such occasions," she said, listing that subtle gender and class faultlines.
"Interestingly, in a number of folk rituals that I have seen, women have no male mediation at all in invoking Lakshmi. So much of female bonding happens on these occasions that the women forget about men," she said.
According to the writer, "the Brahminical patriarchy creates problems for the goddess".
In several Tamil Brahmin families, "a ritual called Pendukal is practised. Women in the family, who have died as 'sumangaliks', that is before being widowed, all called from their heavenly abodes to bless the women of the family so that they may also also die before their husbands as 'sumangaliks'," she said.
Anthropological studies reveal that in several parts of the Indian subcontinent, "women like to be identified more as Parvathi, Shiva's consort", she said.
"In the most popular of myths, Lakshmi is presented seated on a full blown lotus. She is the daughter of the ocean. She holds unfading lotus flowers in her hands," Mahalakshmi said.
The mascot of the goddess is the owl.
The book, which is almost childlike in the lucidity of its "arguments and style", is divided into seven chapters -- "Lakshmi as the embodiment of wealth and beauty", "Lakshmi as the daughter of the ocean", "Sri Lakshmi and other deities", "Symbols of Lakshmi", "The Iconography of Lakshmi", "Lakshmi Festival and Worship" and the "Ashta Lakshmi Stotram and the Kanakdhara Stotram sacred mantra".
Source: Indo-Asian News Service



The comments passed by the R.Mahalakshmi is based one one personal comments. Today in India no can ask any person of any gender,caste or religion tht he or she cannot perform Puja. To day in India there is hardly any BRAHMIN of stature or quality,they are worse than SHUDRAS, i AM TOTALLY AGREE WITH THIS.What has been quoted in BHAGWAD GITA Shudras are no way lower than BRAHMIN AND THESE ARE FOUR INHERENT QUALITYES OF BIRTH AND REFINED DUE TO KARMA AFTER THEIR BIRTH. Those who are opping it shud be brought to books by the law of the land.
What is presented by R.Mahalakshmi as gender bias is not research, but a prejudiced views of the Brahminical self servers from where she got her experience. It was a tragedy that the so called Brahmins in the medieval India usurped all rights to understand and propitiate the god or goddess, temple and all properties under their whims and fancies. This is neither supported by any of the text or scriptures but assumed by the Brahminical order to keep hold on the society by spreading misconception and to monopolize dharma to serve their selfish ends. The scriptures never allow any gender bias, men and women all are equal in front of the god and have equal right to perform rituals and propitiate the god. Even today many Brahmins as a community follow the stupidity of their age old customs which has no relevance or sanctity based on scriptures. Veda Vyasa in Mahabharata says clearly all are born as :Shudras" and Karma alone make on Brahmana. None of these Brahmins can be considered as above that of an authority called Saint Veda Vyasa. However, the Brahmins practice this stupidity, ignorance and discrimination in temple rituals and in their own community in many part of India. None of them can be called as Brahmin as they are doing a disservice to their own society.
Adi Shankara in "Soundarya Lahari" admire the god as female deity, the ruler of the universe. Adi Shankara has opposed to the misconception of the Barhmins of Kaladi and lit the funeral pyre of his mother despite being a Brhmachari and Sanyasi (Ref.Adi Shankara by Madhavacharya). The History of Adishankara also states that Lord Shiva has appeared in front of him at Kashi as a "low caste man" to educate him about the misconception and futility of caste or discrimination based on that. The Vedas, Upanishads, Ramayan or Bhagawat Gita never advocate any sort of discrimination be it based on gender, religion, caste, language or geography.
Goddess Mahalakshmi can be worshipped by any one irrespective the gender, caste or religion. This worship is for accomplishment, prosperity and happiness. Today in India there is hardly any Brahmin of stature or quality, they are worse than Shudras.
According to Bhagawad Gita Shudras are no way lower than the Brhamin and these are four inherent qualities of birth and refined due to Karma.